Every example below is real work from a design partner. We read the signal customers were already leaving, then changed the surface where the decision happens. Names are withheld until each partner clears them, the work is not.
+31% and +15% revenue in Amazon's own A/B tests, live now. See the tests →
From a real optimization report for a chili crisp brand on Amazon. Title in, optimized title out, every edit tied to evidence. The brand shipped it.
Jalapeno Pepper Chile Crunch 6oz - Mild Mexican Chili Crisp in 100% All Natural Seasoned Olive Oil, Garlic & Rosemary - Spicy Crunchy Hot Sauce – Keto Friendly Vegan Gluten Free NON GMO
Brand Jalapeño Chile Crunch 6oz – Crispy Chili Oil with Crunchy Garlic & Rosemary in Extra Virgin Olive Oil – Mild Mexican Chili Crisp Topping for Eggs, Tacos & Ramen – Vegan, Gluten Free
monthly searches for “crispy chili oil crunch” the old title never matched
versatility, the top positive theme across the analyzed reviews (50%)
“NON GMO” stripped: an unapproved claim caught by the compliance gate
The listing sold the look. The reviews said the product failed the one moment that mattered.
“The cake was all show and no go, too hard for my dog to eat. I had to use a drill to get the candles in.”
Why it's stronger: it answers the #1 review complaint, that the cake was too hard to eat, while keeping the gift-ready presentation buyers loved.
The same brand then ran Action Signal across its catalog: content, creative, copy, and search. Then they put the rewrites in front of Amazon's own testing tool.
Action Signal recommendations don't stay theoretical. Our rewritten titles are running head-to-head against incumbent listings inside Amazon's own A/B testing environment for a premium gifting brand. Same listing, same price, same images, traffic split by Amazon. Just the words, rewritten in the customer's own language.
+34.5% conversion on evenly split traffic
+12.7% conversion, measured per visitor
Six weeks of data across roughly 120,000 shoppers. Both tests are still running.
Every line of that report traces to real signal. The model is one step; the grounding is the product.
Reviews mined with aspect-level sentiment. Versatility +97, Crunch +87, Garlic +83, and the burnt-pieces complaint flagged at -73.
Search-volume clusters and a detected Feb to Apr demand window. “jalapeno crisps” at 5,949 trailing-year searches; the old title matched almost none.
Three category leaders read in full. Their friction, “excessive oil content,” becomes your wedge.
Unapproved claims (“NON GMO”) stripped automatically before they ship. Judgment encoded, not guessed.
The work is real. The names stay off until each partner signs off. Then they drop in here.
Private beta. We take on a small number of brands at a time.